Wordle: Of Man
Become a StrangeBedfellow!
Showing posts with label Legal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Legal. Show all posts

When Sex Is Not as Private as You Expect

Friday, August 22, 2008 by Unknown

From ABCNews.com:

People are (or will be) having sex all around America today. But that's nobody's business. Sex is a private matter, right? Except that local authorities sometimes say it is their business.



Read the rest of this excellent article by John Stossel and Patrick McMenamin here.

'The Citizens Deserve Peace'—but Not Freedom

Monday, August 18, 2008 by Unknown

From Jacob Sullum @ Reason's Hit & Run Blog:

On Tuesday the city council of Helena—West Helena, Arkansas, unanimously gave police the authority to impose a 24-hour curfew on any part of the city. A.P. reports that a 24-hour curfew already has been in effect in one especially crime-ridden neighborhood of the town for a week. (Doesn't that make it a 168-hour curfew?) So far the curfew has resulted in 32 arrests, mostly for misdemeanors. Although police, who are armed with "military-style M-16 or M-4 rifles, some equipped with laser sights" as well as "short-barrel shotguns," could arrest people simply for leaving their homes

More here.

Supreme Court Affirms Individuality of Second Amendment

Friday, June 27, 2008 by Unknown

Today we see the Supreme Court finally admit that the second amendment is an individual right along with the rest of the bill of rights. So all of you gun nuts (I'm one too) rejoice.

Although I feel kind of bad for the poor gun control advocates. Their logic may have been flawed and they may have used emotional manipulation to get their favorite pieces of legislation passed, but dammit, they're nice decent people...........Aah, who am I kidding? A gun control advocate is just like any other power hungry, megalomaniac out there.

And the arguments have been the same for god knows how long. Don't you guy's think maybe you should change up your reasoning a little.

These are getting old:
  • Guns kill people - Guns don't kill people. A gun can't fire itself or load itself. A gun is a tool like so many other things and like so many other thing can be used for good or ill. So strike one for one of the many pieces of flawed logic by gun control advocates.
  • The second amendment is a collective right - First of all, rights can not be collective in nature, two people don't have more rights than one person. Secondly, the second amendment
    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms,(emphasis is mine) shall not be infringed
    clearly states the individuality of the right to keep and bear arms.

and

  • It'll lower crime rates - The fact of the matter is that communities that have a high gun ownership rate are usually much safer than those that do not. Think about it. What criminal is going to try and rob or rape someone who's packing heat and knows (presumably) how to use it? Criminals have a tendency to go after easy marks, those they perceive to be weak or timid. Also, gun control laws only really affect law abiding citizens. They don't prevent criminals from getting guns. Criminals will just go to a black market gun dealer


And here we have some of what the gun control nuts at the NY Times would like you to believe:
Thirty-thousand Americans are killed by guns every year — on the job, walking to school, at the shopping mall. The Supreme Court on Thursday all but ensured that even more Americans will die senselessly with its wrongheaded and dangerous ruling striking down key parts of the District of Columbia’s gun-control law.

In a radical break from 70 years of Supreme Court precedent, Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority, declared that the Second Amendment guarantees individuals the right to bear arms for nonmilitary uses, even though the amendment clearly links the right to service in a “militia.” The ruling will give gun-rights advocates a powerful new legal tool to try to strike down gun-control laws across the nation.

This is a decision that will cost innocent lives, cause immeasurable pain and suffering and turn America into a more dangerous country. It will also diminish our standing in the world, sending yet another message that the United States values gun rights over human life.

More here.


And here is the landmark Supreme Court decision.

Say it Ain't So!!!

Sunday, June 8, 2008 by Unknown

Can a 13 yr old girl be a sexual predator when her victims are of legal age?

Read this and decide for yourself.

Everything You Thought You Knew is Wrong

Tuesday, April 15, 2008 by Unknown

The Second Amendment
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.


Now there's been quite a bit of debate as to whether or not the second amendment protects the individual right of self-defense or the collective right of the state to arm militias.

Look at it this way; Every other right protected by the bill of rights protects individual liberty, so why would it be different for the second amendment?

Rights are individual by nature. We as individuals have an inherent right to defend our home, our loved ones and ourselves. Just because a group of individuals decides to voluntarily associate does not mean that that association has more rights than its individual members.

Any time someone prattles on about the rights of society, all they're really talking about is the strength and power of the majority. Their reasoning is that because the majority thinks that something is bad, then, well, tough shit for the rest of you you have to do what we say. And if you don't we'll use force to make you do it. This is exactly the reason the framers of the Constitution thought it necessary to protect the
individual right to keep and bear arms. Otherwise, we might as well live in Communist China or Soviet Russia.










You know something, I probably should've done this post on Socialism vs Liberty. Maybe I'll save that for another day.

Bush Demands More Surveillance Powers

Sunday, March 23, 2008 by Unknown

From Blog Critics Magazine:

On the heels of President Bush demanding that Congress give and/or restore broader presidential surveillance powers over private citizens, a new wrinkle in the story surfaced today. The U.S. State Department Inspector General’s office revealed that contractors connected with that agency had breached security protocols in order to obtain travel records of the three remaining presidential candidates.

The incidents were reported to the Bush administration only yesterday, despite the fact that news of some of the breaches was brought to the attention of officials several months ago. It also came to light that apparently no upper-level personnel within the State Department were notified of the breaches until Thursday, March 20.

Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s records were compromised in 2007, apparently during a training exercise. The trainee was supposed to enter a family member’s name, but instead he entered Hillary Clinton’s instead. Information was read concerning the senator’s private itineraries, along with other undisclosed and confidential details.

More on this breaking news here.
Add to Technorati Favorites

Don't Ask, Don't Tase

Saturday, March 22, 2008 by Unknown



In this video a man tells the police officer he won't sign a speeding ticket until he's shown the temporary speed limit sign, the cop then asks him to get out of the car. When the man points back down the road and insists he was going the speed limit, the police officer tazes him right there on the road. Naturally, the man's pregnant wife freaks the f*ck out.

Listen to the cop's explanation at the end. Was law and order helped or hindered through the actions of law enforcement? Please answer in the comments.

Oh, by the way; You actually have the right to refuse to sign a traffic ticket no matter what the cops may say.

Add to Technorati Favorites

Abolish the Fed

Thursday, March 13, 2008 by Unknown

From CNBC:

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke should resign and the Fed should be abolished as a way to boost the falling dollar and speed up the recovery of the U.S. economy, investor Jim Rogers, CEO of Rogers Holdings, told CNBC Europe Wednesday.

Asked what he would do if he were in Bernanke's shoes, Rogers, who slammed the Fed for pouring liquidity in the system and accepting mortgage-backed securities as guarantees, said: "I would abolish the Federal Reserve and I would resign."

More here.

Mother on Trial for Leaving Child in Car for Minutes

by Unknown

From FoxNews.com:

Treffly Coyne was out of her car for just minutes and no more than 10 yards away.

But that was long and far enough to land her in court after a police officer spotted her sleeping 2-year-old daughter alone in the vehicle; Coyne had taken her two older daughters to pour $8.29 in coins into a Salvation Army kettle.

Minutes later, she was under arrest — the focus of both a police investigation and a probe by the state's child welfare agency. Now the case that has become an Internet flash point for people who either blast police for overstepping their authority or Coyne for putting a child in danger.

More here.

Real ID

Wednesday, March 12, 2008 by Unknown

From theSeminal.com:

Montanans have themselves a fine Governor.

The Department of Homeland Security is trying to force states to issues "Real ID-compliant" drivers licenses. The Real ID Act of 2005 requires licenses to hold electronically encoded information, along with more complicated background checks for license applicants.

Let's hope more states follow suit.

More on this story here.

Several States Weighing Lower Drinking Age

by Unknown

From The Chicago Tribune:

More than two decades after the U.S. set the national drinking age at 21, a movement is gaining traction to revisit the issue and consider allowing Americans as young as 18 to legally consume alcohol.

Serious discussions already are under way in several states.

More here.

Let's Keep Our Juries Dumb

Tuesday, March 11, 2008 by Unknown

From United Press International:

In America we like our juries dumb and predictable. God forbid they should know anything about the case they're judging, much less the law they're judging it by. We need to protect them from all sorts of things that could infect their brains with information.

If we didn't do that, it would be like trusting 12 guys off the street to dispense justice. What a quaint idea. And, obviously, a dangerous one.

The idea of a jury is at least 3,000 years old -- the Greeks thought 12 was the perfect number of panelists -- but our version of it is much younger. We're coming up on the 800th anniversary of the year when King John was told, essentially, stop forcing your laws down our throats or we're going to burn down your castle.

Voila! The modern jury system was born. The king could decree all the laws he wanted to decree, but from then on it would be 12 guys from the neighborhood who decided whether they would actually be used against anybody.

More here.

Home Schooling Threatened in California - Pt. 2

Monday, March 10, 2008 by Unknown

From AOL News:

A California court ruling that challenges parents' legal right to teach their children at home is angering home schoolers, who hope the state's Supreme Court will overturn the decision. Otherwise, advocates say, thousands of families may be forced to abandon home schooling.

More here.

Sheriff Apologizes to Strickland Family; County to Pay $2.45 Million

Saturday, March 8, 2008 by Unknown

From Star News Online:

More than a year after a law enforcement officer’s mistake left a teen dead and a family in grief, Peyton Strickland’s parents finally have found closure.

That closure came on Tuesday evening with a settlement of $2.45 million and a public apology from New Hanover County Sheriff Sid Causey. Additionally, Causey agreed to an independent review of the heavily armed team responsible for Strickland’s death.

More here.

California vs Homeschoolers

Friday, March 7, 2008 by Unknown

From The San Fransisco Chronicle:

A California appeals court ruling clamping down on homeschooling by parents without teaching credentials sent shock waves across the state this week, leaving an estimated 166,000 children as possible truants and their parents at risk of prosecution.

The homeschooling movement never saw the case coming.

More here.

Quaker Teacher Fired for Changing Loyalty Oath

Monday, March 3, 2008 by Unknown

From BoingBoing.net:

A Quaker math teacher at California State University East Bay has been fired for inserting the word "nonviolently" into the loyalty oath that state employees are required to sign. The woman, who works with young people who need remedial help with math, has always made this change in the loyalty oaths she's signed throughout her long teaching career, but the CSU East Bay administration fired her for refusing to pledge to violate her religion's tenets to in defense of the Constitution (a document that guarantees religious freedom).


more here.

And from the San Fransisco Chronicle:

California State University East Bay has fired a math teacher after six weeks on the job because she inserted the word "nonviolently" in her state-required Oath of Allegiance form.

Marianne Kearney-Brown, a Quaker and graduate student who began teaching remedial math to undergrads Jan. 7, lost her $700-a-month part-time job after refusing to sign an 87-word Oath of Allegiance to the Constitution that the state requires of elected officials and public employees.

more here.

Legal Jihad

by Unknown

From Jules Crittenden:

America’s largest news agency has sent the lawyers after a blogger, who happens to be a long-time critic, on fair use.

More here.

From the Folks in the Legal Dept.

Saturday, February 23, 2008 by Unknown

READ CAREFULLY. By viewing this webpage you agree, on behalf of your employer, to release me from all obligations and waivers arising from any and all NON-NEGOTIATED agreements, licenses, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwrap, browsewrap, confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and acceptable use policies (”BOGUS AGREEMENTS”) that I have entered into with your employer, its partners, licensors, agents and assigns, in perpetuity, without prejudice to my ongoing rights and privileges. You further represent that you have the authority to release me from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of your employer.


From the wonderful people at ReasonableAgreement.org

Filed under , having 0 comments